Calabrese v. Godin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Calabrese v. Godin

265 A.D.2d 519, 696 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 519 (Calabrese v. Godin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calabrese v. Godin, 265 A.D.2d 519, 696 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated August 31, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants’ submissions made out a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The evidence which the plaintiff submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated August 31, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants’ submissions made out a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The evidence which the plaintiff submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 519, 696 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calabrese-v-godin-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack