Cal. Midland Ry. v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Cal. Midland Ry. v. Smith

178 Cal. 812

California Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 1918·No. Sac. No. 2575; Sac. No. 2576·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 Pac. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 Pac. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Cal. Midland Ry. v. Smith, 178 Cal. 812 (Cal. 1918).

Pincite

178 Cal. 812 (Cal. Midland Ry. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related