Cal-Fruit Suma Intern. v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

Third Circuit

Cal-Fruit Suma Intern. v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

875 F.2d 309, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6031, 1989 WL 43804

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 1989

Docket88-1929

StatusPublished

This text of 875 F.2d 309 (Cal-Fruit Suma Intern. v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cal-Fruit Suma Intern. v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 875 F.2d 309, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6031, 1989 WL 43804 (3d Cir. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

875 F.2d 309

Cal-Fruit Suma International Chilean Exporters Association
Coexport International, Inc., Fisher Bros. Sales, Jac.
Vandenberg, Inc., Oneonta Trading Corp., Paramount Fruit,
Inc., William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc.
v.
U.S. Department of Agriculture

NO. 88-1929

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

APR 28, 1989

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Fullam, J.,

698 F.Supp. 80

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI