Cakora ex rel. Cakora v. Metropolitan Dade County

388 So. 2d 31, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17986
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 1980·No. No. 80-481·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court entered a final summary judgment in favor of the county on the sole basis that the duty of care owing to Cakora as set forth in Section 375.251, Florida Statutes (1977), was not violated. Subsequent to the entry of this judgment, we held in Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 389 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), that Section 375.251, Florida Statutes (1977), is not applicable to counties. Finding no other basis upon which to uphold the entry of the trial court’s judgment, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cakora ex rel. Cakora v. Metropolitan Dade County, 388 So. 2d 31, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17986 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

388 So. 2d 31 (Cakora ex rel. Cakora v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Loach v. State
388 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)