Cake's Appeal

23 Pa. 186
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 23 Pa. 186 (Cake's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cake's Appeal, 23 Pa. 186 (Pa. 1854).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Knox, J.

This case is free from difficulty. A mortgage given for the residue of the purchase-money due upon a tract of land [189]*189bearing even date with the conveyance of the legal title, and duly recorded, has priority of lien over judgments obtained against the holder of the equitable interest anterior to the conveyance, and therefore a sale upon a judgment entered subsequently to the mortgage does not divest its lien.

So much of Huntzinger’s judgment as was for purchase-money was clearly entitled to priority in the distribution of the proceeds arising from the sale of lot' No. 5, and the residue was the first lien upon lot No. 6. The auditor was therefore right in paying tho whole of this judgment.

The judgment of II. L. Cake et al. was last in order of time, and although its consideration was used in paying a portion of the purchase-money, it was not entered until eight days after the delivery of the deed, and the unity of the legal and equitable interest had extended the lien of all prior judgments over the whole estate.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Case's Petition
27 Pa. D. & C. 391 (Bradford County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Brumbach v. Pearson
13 Pa. D. & C. 762 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1929)
In re Deardorff
17 F.2d 294 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Pa. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cakes-appeal-pa-1854.