Cake v. Stidfole

Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas

Cake v. Stidfole

2 Foster 101

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County

DecidedMarch 9, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Foster 101 (Cake v. Stidfole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cake v. Stidfole, 2 Foster 101 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

March 9th, 1874.

The affidavit of defense does not deny actual notice. Indeed this is impliedly admitted, the qualification-being that the defendant is informed that the protest and certificate were not actually made by the notary himself. This information is not averred to. be.believed by him, and might have been given by one who himself had no sufficient information.All that is stated might be true, and yet the defendant might have actual notice of the protest.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

March 9th, 1874.

The affidavit of defense does not deny actual notice. Indeed this is impliedly admitted, the qualification-being that the defendant is informed that the protest and certificate were not actually made by the notary himself. This information is not averred to. be.believed by him, and might have been given by one who himself had no sufficient information.All that is stated might be true, and yet the defendant might have actual notice of the protest.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Foster 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cake-v-stidfole-pactcomplschuyl-1874.