Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.

334 So. 2d 554, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 3396
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 30, 1976
Docket7929
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 334 So. 2d 554 (Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 334 So. 2d 554, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 3396 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

334 So.2d 554 (1976)

CAJUN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.
v.
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY.

No. 7929.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

June 30, 1976.

*555 John Schwab, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

Monroe & Lemann, Andrew P. Carter, William T. Tete, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before GULOTTA, STOULIG and MORIAL, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

GULOTTA, Judge.

This matter is before us on a motion, filed by Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., to dismiss the appeal. Plaintiff's petition seeks "to compel arbitration". On remand from this court, the trial judge ordered the parties to "proceed with arbitration of their differences". The basis of the motion to dismiss is that the trial court's judgment is an "interlocutory judgment that cannot cause irreparable injury to the appellant and is therefore not appealable". We disagree.

LSA-C.C.P. art. 2083 states:
Art. 2083. Judgments appealable
"An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, and from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury."

In addition, LSA-C.C.P. art. 1841, in pertinent part, states:

Art. 1841. Judgments, interlocutory and final
* * * * * *
"A judgment that determines the merits in whole or in part is a final judgment."

When the trial judge ordered arbitration, he passed on the merits of the case. Therefore, the trial court judgment is a final judgment. The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

MOTION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wesley Retirement Services, Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc.
594 N.W.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1999)
Horsey v. Horsey
620 A.2d 305 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Port of Portland
628 P.2d 720 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 So. 2d 554, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 3396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cajun-electric-power-cooperative-inc-v-louisiana-power-light-co-lactapp-1976.