CAJ v. State

732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 WL 375561
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 1999
Docket98-2668
StatusPublished

This text of 732 So. 2d 1228 (CAJ v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CAJ v. State, 732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 WL 375561 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

732 So.2d 1228 (1999)

C.A.J., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-2668.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 11, 1999.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs, with opinion.

DAUKSCH, J., concurring specially.

The question in this appeal is whether a person may lawfully possess a common pocketknife on school property, or at a school bus stop. The answer is no, unless "as authorized in school sanctioned activities." § 790.115(2)(a). This statute became effective October 1, 1997 and is unique in its proscription of the common pocketknife because theretofore one could possess such at school. The legislature probably enacted this statute in response to the ruling in L.B. v. State, 700 So.2d 370 (Fla.1997), which held that because the statutory definition of "weapon" at that time specifically excluded common pocketknives, see § 790.001(13), and the statute prohibiting weapons at school did not specifically define weapon, that the legislature must have intended the general definition which excluded common pocketknives.

Thus, the new statute is clear and is not vague in its wording that one cannot have any knife at school.

A person shall not possess any firearm, electric weapon or device, destructive device, or other weapon, including a razor blade, box cutter, or knife, except as authorized in support of school-sanctioned activities, on the property of any school, school bus, or school bus stop.

There was no error in refusing to dismiss the charges or in ruling the statute constitutional.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L.B. v. State
700 So. 2d 370 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 So. 2d 1228, 1999 WL 375561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caj-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.