Caito v. Zoning Board of Review

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Caito v. Zoning Board of Review

240 A.2d 407, 103 R.I. 661, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 846

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 11, 1968·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a petition for certiorari which was brought to quash the respondent board’s decision granting an application for a special exception permitting the operation of a commercial use in a residential district.

When the cause came on to be heard, we were advised by counsel that the property owners in whose favor the board had rendered its decision desired to offer no opposition to the granting of the petition and the quashing of the board’s decision.

Anthony B. Sciarretta, Gordon C. Mulligan, for petitioners. Jeremiah S. Jeremiah, Jr., Assistant City Solicitor, for respondent.

Having been thus assured by all parties, the petition for certiorari is granted and the decision of the board is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a petition for certiorari which was brought to quash the respondent board’s decision granting an application for a special exception permitting the operation of a commercial use in a residential district.

When the cause came on to be heard, we were advised by counsel that the property owners in whose favor the board had rendered its decision desired to offer no opposition to the granting of the petition and the quashing of the board’s decision.

Anthony B. Sciarretta, Gordon C. Mulligan, for petitioners. Jeremiah S. Jeremiah, Jr., Assistant City Solicitor, for respondent.

Having been thus assured by all parties, the petition for certiorari is granted and the decision of the board is quashed.

Caito v. Zoning Board of Review, 240 A.2d 407, 103 R.I. 661, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 846 (R.I. 1968).

Pincite

240 A.2d 407 (Caito v. Zoning Board of Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.