Caito v. Zoning Board of Review

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Caito v. Zoning Board of Review

240 A.2d 407, 103 R.I. 661, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 846

DecidedApril 11, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.2d 407 (Caito v. Zoning Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caito v. Zoning Board of Review, 240 A.2d 407, 103 R.I. 661, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 846 (R.I. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a petition for certiorari which was brought to quash the respondent board’s decision granting an application for a special exception permitting the operation of a commercial use in a residential district.

When the cause came on to be heard, we were advised by counsel that the property owners in whose favor the board had rendered its decision desired to offer no opposition to the granting of the petition and the quashing of the board’s decision.

Anthony B. Sciarretta, Gordon C. Mulligan, for petitioners. Jeremiah S. Jeremiah, Jr., Assistant City Solicitor, for respondent.

Having been thus assured by all parties, the petition for certiorari is granted and the decision of the board is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a petition for certiorari which was brought to quash the respondent board’s decision granting an application for a special exception permitting the operation of a commercial use in a residential district.

When the cause came on to be heard, we were advised by counsel that the property owners in whose favor the board had rendered its decision desired to offer no opposition to the granting of the petition and the quashing of the board’s decision.

Anthony B. Sciarretta, Gordon C. Mulligan, for petitioners. Jeremiah S. Jeremiah, Jr., Assistant City Solicitor, for respondent.

Having been thus assured by all parties, the petition for certiorari is granted and the decision of the board is quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.2d 407, 103 R.I. 661, 1968 R.I. LEXIS 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caito-v-zoning-board-of-review-ri-1968.