Caito v. Penland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Caito v. Penland

476 So. 2d 745, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2284, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16104

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 2, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2535

StatusPublished

This text of 476 So. 2d 745 (Caito v. Penland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caito v. Penland, 476 So. 2d 745, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2284, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16104 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the husband from a dissolution of marriage judgment.

We affirm the award of permanent periodic alimony to the wife upon authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980) and Goss v. Goss, 400 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

It appearing without question that the trial court, by reason of oversight, failed to determine the respective rights of the parties to a jointly owned money market account, we remand the cause with instructions to make such determination.

We affirm the judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI