Cairns v. Chabert

3 Edw. Ch. 312
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedApril 22, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 3 Edw. Ch. 312 (Cairns v. Chabert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cairns v. Chabert, 3 Edw. Ch. 312 (N.Y. 1839).

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor :

The present motion is pressed on account of arrears of taxes. The tenant for life is bound to keep down ordinary charges for taxes and repairs out of the rents and income of the estate. The principle, perhaps, might not apply in relation to an assessment which goes to [313]*313permanent benefit of the inheritance. In such a case, it is likely that some rule of apportionment would have to be resorted to. Here, the application is in regard to the payment of ordinary taxes. Let an order of reference to a master be entered, to appoint a receiver of so much of the rents and income of the estate as shall be necessary to pay off and discharge the taxes now due and in arrear to the corporation of the city of New-York from any part or portion of the estate ; unless, within forty days from the service of a copy of the order, the defendants, Chabert and wife, shall show, to the satisfaction of the master, that the taxes have been paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Schulz
133 Misc. 168 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1928)
In re Catfish River Drainage District
187 N.W. 673 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1922)
Abernethy v. Orton
71 P. 327 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)
Chamberlin v. . Gleason
57 N.E. 487 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Sage v. City of Gloversville
43 A.D. 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Huston v. Tribbetts
49 N.E. 711 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)
Defreese v. Lake
32 L.R.A. 744 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
Moore v. Simonson
39 P. 1105 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1895)
Cullen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.
61 N.W. 818 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)
Jenks v. Horton
55 N.W. 372 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Clarke v. Clarke
8 Misc. 339 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Murch v. J. O. Smith Manufacturing Co.
47 N.J. Eq. 193 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1890)
Smith v. Blindbury
33 N.W. 391 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1887)
Thomas v. . Evans
12 N.E. 571 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Jonas v. Hunt
40 N.J. Eq. 660 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1885)
Estate of Morgan
1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 182 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1885)
Rowland v. Morgan
3 Dem. Sur. 289 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1885)
Pruitt v. Holly
73 Ala. 369 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)
De Witt v. Cooper
25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 67 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Edw. Ch. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cairns-v-chabert-nychanct-1839.