Cairnes v. Hemminger

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 BRADLEY RAY CAIRNES, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C24-0486-JCC 10 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 11 PAMELA HEMMINGER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405.00 filing fee, 14 Plaintiff financially qualifies for in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 15 1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff’s IFP application, Dkt. 1, is GRANTED. However, the 16 undersigned recommends review by the assigned District Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 17 (e)(2)(B). See, e.g., Cairnes v. Hemminger, No. C22-1614JLR, 2022 WL 17415130 (W.D. 18 Wash. Dec. 5, 2022). The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff 19 and to the assigned District Judge. 20 Dated this 12th day of April, 2024. 21 22 A S. KATE VAUGHAN 23 United States Magistrate Judge