Cain v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cain v. State

796 S.W.2d 121, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1406, 1990 WL 138377

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cain v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 795 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 1990·No. No. 57954·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

An opinion reciting movant’s allegations, the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

An opinion reciting movant’s allegations, the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cain v. State, 796 S.W.2d 121, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1406, 1990 WL 138377 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

796 S.W.2d 121 (Cain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.