Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cain v. State

Cain v. State

823 So. 2d 251, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18167, 2002 WL 1799753
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cain v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6553 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 2002·No. No. 4D01-4200·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed as to the burglary charge; the judgment is reversed as to the grand theft and remanded to the trial court with directions to enter a judgment of conviction for petit theft. See I.T. v. State, 796 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

STONE, MAY, JJ., and JACOBUS, BRUCE W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cain v. State, 823 So. 2d 251, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18167, 2002 WL 1799753 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

823 So. 2d 251 (Cain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

I.T. v. State
796 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)