Cain v. Stanger Enterprises LLC

District Court, D. Nebraska·Decided February 10, 2025·No. 4:23-cv-03195·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NOLAN CAIN, Plaintiff, 4:23-CV-3195 VS. AARON M. STANGER and ORDER STANGER ENTERPRISES LLC, doing business as Premier Pools and Spas, Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's objection (filing 71) to the Magistrate Judge's memorandum and order (filing 69) reconsidering her earlier recommendation of default as a sanction, and instead ordering monetary sanctions. A district court may reconsider a magistrate judge's ruling on nondispositive pretrial matters only where it has been shown that the ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Ferguson v. United States, 484 F.3d 1068, 1076 (8th Cir. 2007). The Magistrate Judge's order here was neither. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's objection (filing 71) is overruled.

Dated this 10th day of February, 2025.

BY THE COURT:

hn M. Gerrard enior United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cain v. Stanger Enterprises LLC, (D. Neb. 2025).

Cain v. Stanger Enterprises LLC (Cain v. Stanger Enterprises LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related