Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad

22 S.E. 918, 97 Ga. 298
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 918 (Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad, 22 S.E. 918, 97 Ga. 298 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence introduced hy the plaintiff showing clearly that, even if the defendant was negligent at all, the plaintiff, after its negligence began, might hy the exercise of ordinary care easily have avoided being injured, he was not entitled to recover. The court was therefore right in granting a nonsuit. ' Judgment affirmed.

Grace & J ones, for plaintiff. Bacon & Miller, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Larsen
91 S.E. 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Powell v. Berry
89 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Athens Railway & Electric Co. v. McKinney
86 S.E. 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 918, 97 Ga. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cain-v-macon-consolidated-street-railroad-ga-1895.