Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad

22 S.E. 918, 97 Ga. 298
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 29, 1895·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence introduced hy the plaintiff showing clearly that, even if the defendant was negligent at all, the plaintiff, after its negligence began, might hy the exercise of ordinary care easily have avoided being injured, he was not entitled to recover. The court was therefore right in granting a nonsuit. ' Judgment affirmed.

Grace & J ones, for plaintiff. Bacon & Miller, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad, 22 S.E. 918, 97 Ga. 298 (Ga. 1895).

22 S.E. 918 (Cain v. Macon Consolidated Street Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Larsen
91 S.E. 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Powell v. Berry
89 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Athens Railway & Electric Co. v. McKinney
86 S.E. 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)