Cain v. Mack

Texas Supreme Court

Cain v. Mack

33 Tex. 135

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1870

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 Tex. 135 (Cain v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cain v. Mack, 33 Tex. 135 (Tex. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.

We think it was competent for the plaintiff below to prove by parol the authority of W. T. Heal to sign the name [136]*136of Mrs. M. Cheney, his mother, to the note sued on; and that there is no error appearing on the record.- There was no motion in the district court for a new trial, nor does any statement of facts accompany the record. (See Hart v. Ware, 8 Tex. R. 115.)

Where there is no motion for a new trial the judgment of the court below will not he disturbed on the ground that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. The judgment below is affirmed,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.

We think it was competent for the plaintiff below to prove by parol the authority of W. T. Heal to sign the name [136]*136of Mrs. M. Cheney, his mother, to the note sued on; and that there is no error appearing on the record.- There was no motion in the district court for a new trial, nor does any statement of facts accompany the record. (See Hart v. Ware, 8 Tex. R. 115.)

Where there is no motion for a new trial the judgment of the court below will not he disturbed on the ground that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. The judgment below is affirmed,

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Tex. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cain-v-mack-tex-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack