Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cain v. Kirsch

Cain v. Kirsch

96 So. 3d 1161, 2012 WL 4226405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15879
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 2012
DocketNo. 1D12-2584
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 3d 1161 (Cain v. Kirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cain v. Kirsch, 96 So. 3d 1161, 2012 WL 4226405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15879 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Jackson v. Computer Sci Raytheon, 36 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (stating that court lacks certiorari jurisdiction where irreparable harm is not established).

MARSTILLER, RAY and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. COMPUTER SCIENCE RAYTHEON
36 So. 3d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 3d 1161, 2012 WL 4226405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cain-v-kirsch-fladistctapp-2012.