Caidin v. Lakow

718 So. 2d 885, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 1998 WL 567868
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 9, 1998
DocketNo. 96-36
StatusPublished

This text of 718 So. 2d 885 (Caidin v. Lakow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caidin v. Lakow, 718 So. 2d 885, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 1998 WL 567868 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Schwartz, Gold & Cohen, P.A. v. Streicher, 549 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz, Gold & Cohen, PA v. Streicher
549 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 So. 2d 885, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 1998 WL 567868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caidin-v-lakow-fladistctapp-1998.