Caiazza v. Sclafani
This text of 45 A.D.2d 940 (Caiazza v. Sclafani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated 1974, affirmed, without costs (Matter of Duffy v. Hayduk, 41 A D 2d 944). Upon the argument of the appeal, it was conceded that the addresses of the subscribing witnesses, as stated in the petition, were the same addresses at which they resided the previous year. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Cohalari and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.2d 940, 359 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caiazza-v-sclafani-nyappdiv-1974.