Cai Qiang Li v. Yang

36 A.D.3d 642, 826 N.Y.S.2d 586
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rosenberg, J.), dated October 17, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. In opposition, the affidavit of the plaintiffs’ expert failed to raise a triable issue of fact, as it contained only conclusory and unsupported allegations (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Schmidt, J.P, Santucci, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cai Qiang Li v. Yang, 36 A.D.3d 642, 826 N.Y.S.2d 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

36 A.D.3d 642 (Cai Qiang Li v. Yang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ennd v. Kopp
48 A.D.3d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)