Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co.
796 So. 2d 532, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1907, 2001 WL 1130542
Opinion
We have for review U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on apparent conflict with Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Pinnacle Medical, Inc., 753 So.2d 55 (Fla.2000). Upon further review we have determined that conflict does not exist and that there is no other valid basis for jurisdiction here. Accordingly, the petition for review was improvidently granted and is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co., 796 So. 2d 532, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1907, 2001 WL 1130542 (Fla. 2001).
796 So. 2d 532 (Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diamond v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford
890 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Tran v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
860 So. 2d 1000 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Nichols v. State Farm Mut.
851 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)