Cahn v. National City Bank
This text of 247 A.D. 712 (Cahn v. National City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint alleges' that on December 19, 1917, the defendant bank, at New York city, “ received and collected for the use and benefit of the plaintiffs from or through Helsingfors Aktiebank, Helsingfors, Finland,” the sum of $25,000 which “ defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff,” but failed to do so, although duly demanded. Judgment and order denying plaintiffs’ motion for the issuance of a commission unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahn-v-national-city-bank-nyappdiv-1936.