Cahn v. National City Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cahn v. National City Bank

247 A.D. 712

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

The complaint alleges' that on December 19, 1917, the defendant bank, at New York city, “ received and collected for the use and benefit of the plaintiffs from or through Helsingfors Aktiebank, Helsingfors, Finland,” the sum of $25,000 which “ defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff,” but failed to do so, although duly demanded. Judgment and order denying plaintiffs’ motion for the issuance of a commission unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The complaint alleges' that on December 19, 1917, the defendant bank, at New York city, “ received and collected for the use and benefit of the plaintiffs from or through Helsingfors Aktiebank, Helsingfors, Finland,” the sum of $25,000 which “ defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff,” but failed to do so, although duly demanded. Judgment and order denying plaintiffs’ motion for the issuance of a commission unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Cahn v. National City Bank, 247 A.D. 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 712 (Cahn v. National City Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.