Cahn v. Gottschalk

2 N.Y.S. 13, 14 Daly 542, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 7
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided June 4, 1888·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

All the points involved in this case have been so fully and satisfactorily discussed and disposed of in the opinion of the referee, from whose decision this appeal is taken, that in affirming the judgment as wre feel ■bound to do, we place our affirmance upon the grounds stated in said opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cahn v. Gottschalk, 2 N.Y.S. 13, 14 Daly 542, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 7 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

2 N.Y.S. 13 (Cahn v. Gottschalk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. J. A. Scriven Co.
165 F. 639 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)
Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co.
163 F. 977 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)
A. F. Pike Manuf'g Co. v. Cleveland Stone Co.
35 F. 896 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1888)