Cahill v. United States
86 F.2d 993, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4864
This text of 86 F.2d 993 (Cahill v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cahill v. United States, 86 F.2d 993, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4864 (6th Cir. 1937).
Opinion
It appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court that the appellant’s ward, Harry A. Cahill, did not become permanently and totally disabled during the life of the policy sued on,
It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 F.2d 993, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahill-v-united-states-ca6-1937.