Cahill v. Tremaine
245 A.D. 773
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 245 A.D. 773 (Cahill v. Tremaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cahill v. Tremaine, 245 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinions
Hill, P. J., McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., concurs upon the ground that the State, as proprietor, is engaged in the business of insurance, and that the insurance moneys in question are the property of the State; Crapser, J., dissents, with an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Methodist Hospital of Brooklyn v. State Insurance Fund
102 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Methodist Hospital v. State Insurance Fund
117 Misc. 2d 178 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
State Insurance Fund v. Boyland
282 A.D. 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
245 A.D. 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahill-v-tremaine-nyappdiv-1935.