Cahill v. Tremaine
245 A.D. 773
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
Hill, P. J., McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., concurs upon the ground that the State, as proprietor, is engaged in the business of insurance, and that the insurance moneys in question are the property of the State; Crapser, J., dissents, with an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cahill v. Tremaine, 245 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
245 A.D. 773 (Cahill v. Tremaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Methodist Hospital of Brooklyn v. State Insurance Fund
102 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Methodist Hospital v. State Insurance Fund
117 Misc. 2d 178 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
State Insurance Fund v. Boyland
282 A.D. 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)