Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cahill v. State

Cahill v. State

526 So. 2d 220, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502, 1988 WL 59444
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 526 So. 2d 220 (Cahill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cahill v. State, 526 So. 2d 220, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502, 1988 WL 59444 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. However, we remand to the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements: that Count 1, violation of probation for changing residence without consent of probation officer, was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence; that Count 2, violation of condition of probation for failing to submit monthly reports, was violated in the month of May only; that Count 5, violation of condition of probation for uttering a forged instrument, was violated; and Count 6, violation of probation for grand theft, was violated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siroky v. State
532 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 So. 2d 220, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502, 1988 WL 59444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahill-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.