Cahill v. Pintony

4 Munf. 371
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1815
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 371 (Cahill v. Pintony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cahill v. Pintony, 4 Munf. 371 (Va. 1815).

Opinion

Judge Roane

informed the counsel (after the court had inspected the record,) that, this being a doubtful case upon the record, a copy of the minutes of the County Court should be had ; and if that shewed the memorandum of the withdrawal of Spring’s deposition to have been taken from those minutes, and, consequently, an act of the court, and not of the clerk, the judgment would be affirmed, and otherwise reversed for error in admitting that deposition. The copy of the minutes was accordingly procured; from which it appeared, that the plaintiff’s withdrawing Spring’s deposition, as aforesaid, was noted therein ; whereupon, (March 13th, 1815,) the judgment was affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb v. Ritter
54 S.E. 484 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1906)
Norfolk & Petersburg R. R. v. Ormsby
27 Va. 455 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Field v. Brown
24 Gratt. 74 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1873)
Kennaird v. Jones
9 Gratt. 183 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)
Humphreys' Adm'r v. West's Adm'rs
3 Va. 516 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1825)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Munf. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahill-v-pintony-va-1815.