Cahill v. Lichtenstadter
This text of 35 Misc. 833 (Cahill v. Lichtenstadter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence sufficiently establishes a prima facie case. The truck had painted upon it the words, “ M. Lichtenstadter, 54th Street and 1st Avenue.” It was loaded with what appeared to be flour barrels. Defendant was engaged in the flour business at 986 First avenue, near Fifty-fourth street. The facts established were sufficient to- put defendant upon his proof. Doherty v. Lord, 8 Misc. Rep. 227; Seaman v. Koehler, 122 N. Y. 646.
Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 833, 72 N.Y.S. 1096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahill-v-lichtenstadter-nyappterm-1901.