Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

654 So. 2d 636, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1995 WL 264019

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 1995·No. No. 94-2701·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Warwick G. Cahill, appeals an order of the Board of Pilot Commissioners concluding that appellant violated section 310.101(l)(k), Florida Statutes and Fla.Admin.Code R. 21SS-8.007(l)(k). Having reviewed the record, and finding that the Board erred in substituting its judgment for that of the hearing officer as the finder of fact, we reverse. See Holmes v. Turlington, 480 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Heifetz v. Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

ALLEN, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Warwick G. Cahill, appeals an order of the Board of Pilot Commissioners concluding that appellant violated section 310.101(l)(k), Florida Statutes and Fla.Admin.Code R. 21SS-8.007(l)(k). Having reviewed the record, and finding that the Board erred in substituting its judgment for that of the hearing officer as the finder of fact, we reverse. See Holmes v. Turlington, 480 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Heifetz v. Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

ALLEN, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 654 So. 2d 636, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1995 WL 264019 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

654 So. 2d 636 (Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related