Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

654 So. 2d 636, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1995 WL 264019
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1995
DocketNo. 94-2701
StatusPublished

This text of 654 So. 2d 636 (Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cahill v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 654 So. 2d 636, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1995 WL 264019 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Warwick G. Cahill, appeals an order of the Board of Pilot Commissioners concluding that appellant violated section 310.101(l)(k), Florida Statutes and Fla.Admin.Code R. 21SS-8.007(l)(k). Having reviewed the record, and finding that the Board erred in substituting its judgment for that of the hearing officer as the finder of fact, we reverse. See Holmes v. Turlington, 480 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Heifetz v. Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

ALLEN, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holmes v. Turlington
480 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Heifetz v. Dept. of Business Regulation
475 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 So. 2d 636, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1995 WL 264019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahill-v-department-of-business-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-1995.