Cahen v. Mahoney
12 P. 300, 2 Cal. Unrep. 709
This text of 12 P. 300 (Cahen v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cahen v. Mahoney, 12 P. 300, 2 Cal. Unrep. 709 (Cal. 1886).
Opinion
The court erred in dissolving the attachment in this case. The affidavit of the defendant was fully answered by the affidavits produced on behalf of plaintiffs. The court had no right* to disregard or discredit the showing on behalf of plaintiffs. The undertaking was sufficient. Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 P. 300, 2 Cal. Unrep. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cahen-v-mahoney-cal-1886.