Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
389 S.W.2d 945
Opinion
We are not in accord with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that Clarence L. Cagle was judicially estopped by former inconsistent testimony. However, the trial court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the Court of Civil Appeals properly affirmed the judgment. 386 S.W.2d 149. The application for a writ of error is therefore refused, no reversible error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 389 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. 1965).
389 S.W.2d 945 (Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maxwell v. Cardinal Petroleum Corp.
460 S.W.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)