Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

389 S.W.2d 945

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 1965

DocketNo. A-10636

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 389 S.W.2d 945 (Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 389 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are not in accord with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that Clarence L. Cagle was judicially estopped by former inconsistent testimony. However, the trial court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the Court of Civil Appeals properly affirmed the judgment. 386 S.W.2d 149. The application for a writ of error is therefore refused, no reversible error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are not in accord with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that Clarence L. Cagle was judicially estopped by former inconsistent testimony. However, the trial court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the Court of Civil Appeals properly affirmed the judgment. 386 S.W.2d 149. The application for a writ of error is therefore refused, no reversible error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 S.W.2d 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cagle-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-tex-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack