Cagle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cagle v. State

162 S.W.2d 107, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 608

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 20, 1942

DocketNo. 22136

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.W.2d 107 (Cagle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cagle v. State, 162 S.W.2d 107, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 608 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty befpte the court to receiving and concealing stolen property, knowing same to have been stolen, and after a proper, warning and hearing evidence the court found him guilty and assessed his punishment at two years’ confinement in the State penitentiary..

Although he persisted in pleading guilty, and received the minimum penalty, he gave proper notice of appeal, but filed neither a statement of facts nor any bills of exceptions.

The proceedings appear regular in every way, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty befpte the court to receiving and concealing stolen property, knowing same to have been stolen, and after a proper, warning and hearing evidence the court found him guilty and assessed his punishment at two years’ confinement in the State penitentiary..

Although he persisted in pleading guilty, and received the minimum penalty, he gave proper notice of appeal, but filed neither a statement of facts nor any bills of exceptions.

The proceedings appear regular in every way, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.W.2d 107, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cagle-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.