Cagle v. State

63 So. 672, 106 Miss. 370
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court..

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. The prosecution was begun before the mayor of the city of Corinth, as ex officio justice of the peace, and from a conviction in that court an appeal was taken to the circuit court, which court also convicted appellant; wherefore this appeal.

The state relied on several sales to different persons. C. A. Deloach, one of the state’s witnesses, testified that he bought from appellant a pint of whisky. It is contended by appellant, and we think correctly, that this witness did not fix the venue of his purchase within the corporate limits of the city of Corinth.

Lula Murphy, another state’s witness, testified that she, too, bought a pint of whisky from appellant, and in this she was corroborated by Jack Murphy, her husband; but neither witness testified that this sale occurred prior to the date of the affidavit.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cagle v. State, 63 So. 672, 106 Miss. 370 (Mich. 1913).

63 So. 672 (Cagle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nuckolls v. State
179 So. 3d 1046 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2015)
Samuel Allen Nuckolls v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2015
Crum v. State
63 So. 2d 242 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
Johnson v. State
191 So. 115 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)
Ussery v. State
123 So. 854 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Dorsey v. State
106 So. 827 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
Crosby v. State
101 So. 437 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
Slaton v. State
98 So. 838 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
Quillen v. State
64 So. 736 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)