Home/Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama/Cagle v. Cagle

Cagle v. Cagle

101 So. 3d 776, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 193, 2012 WL 3055572
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJuly 27, 2012
Docket2110118
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 3d 776 (Cagle v. Cagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cagle v. Cagle, 101 So. 3d 776, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 193, 2012 WL 3055572 (Ala. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinions

BRYAN, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App. P.; Gonzalez v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama, 760 So.2d 878, 883 (Ala.Civ.App.2000).

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur. MOORE, J., dissents, with writing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Serio v. Serio
3 So. 3d 937 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
Gonzalez v. BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF ALA.
760 So. 2d 878 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 3d 776, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 193, 2012 WL 3055572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cagle-v-cagle-alacivapp-2012.