Cagle v. Baldwin State Bank

151 S.E. 528, 40 Ga. App. 783, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 694
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 23, 1930
Docket19781
StatusPublished

This text of 151 S.E. 528 (Cagle v. Baldwin State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cagle v. Baldwin State Bank, 151 S.E. 528, 40 Ga. App. 783, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 694 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Bell, J.

1. An entry of service must be traversed at the first term after notice, and before pleading to the merits. In the present case the defendant appeared and pleaded to the merits at the first term, and did not file his traverse until a later term. The traverse was therefore too late, and tlie court did not err in striking it. Civil Code (1910), § 5566; Everett v. Holcomb, 1 Ga. App. 794 (3) (58 S. E. 287).

2. Assuming’, without deciding, that the deed made to secure the note sued on was void because of insufficient description of the land, the defendant maker could not upon this ground resist the setting up of a special lien upon the land in accordance with the description as given, since as between the plaintiff and the defendant, and as to this proceeding, the defendant was estopped from raising any such question. Neal v. Harber, 35 Ga. App. 628 (2) (134 S. E. 347).

3. The petition having been amended without any objection on the part of the defendant, no question is presented as to whether the amendment set forth a new and distinct cause of action, or as to whether the evidence supported the petition as originally drawn. The evidence demanded the verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the petition as amended. The court therefore did not err in directing such verdict, nor does any other error appear.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everett, Ridley & Co. v. Holcomb
58 S.E. 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Neal v. Harber
134 S.E. 347 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 S.E. 528, 40 Ga. App. 783, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cagle-v-baldwin-state-bank-gactapp-1930.