Caggia v. Huguenot Greens, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Caggia v. Huguenot Greens, Inc.

187 A.D.2d 407, 590 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 407 (Caggia v. Huguenot Greens, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caggia v. Huguenot Greens, Inc., 187 A.D.2d 407, 590 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cu-sick, J.), entered November 13, 1989, which granted the motion of the defendants Huguenot Greens, Inc. and Jack Feiwus to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The instant action arises out of an alleged breach of a contract for the sale of real property. At the time the action was commenced, an action between the identical parties herein, arising out of the same alleged breach of the same contract of sale, was pending in the Civil Court, Richmond County. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint in the instant action (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [4]; see, JC Mfg. v NPI Elec., 178 AD2d 505, 506; Falzerano v DeLuca, 154 AD2d 431; Stanley Elec. Serv. v City of New York, 26 AD2d 951). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cu-sick, J.), entered November 13, 1989, which granted the motion of the defendants Huguenot Greens, Inc. and Jack Feiwus to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The instant action arises out of an alleged breach of a contract for the sale of real property. At the time the action was commenced, an action between the identical parties herein, arising out of the same alleged breach of the same contract of sale, was pending in the Civil Court, Richmond County. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint in the instant action (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [4]; see, JC Mfg. v NPI Elec., 178 AD2d 505, 506; Falzerano v DeLuca, 154 AD2d 431; Stanley Elec. Serv. v City of New York, 26 AD2d 951). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 407, 590 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caggia-v-huguenot-greens-inc-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack