Cage v. State

330 S.W.2d 433, 168 Tex. Crim. 518, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2641
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 16, 1959
DocketNo. 31,269
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 330 S.W.2d 433 (Cage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cage v. State, 330 S.W.2d 433, 168 Tex. Crim. 518, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2641 (Tex. 1959).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal by the sureties from a forfeiture of an appearance bond in the sum of $1,000 conditioned for the appearance of Ben Jack Cage to answer a felony indictment in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County.

The state concedes that because of an omission in the judgment nisi of the statutory requirement, that it recite that the forfeiture will be made final “unless good cause be shown why the defendant did not appear,” the forfeiture should be set aside and this case remanded to the trial court.

Appellants oppose the state’s motion and say that on this appeal other important questions raised by them should be passed upon.

With these pleas before us, the state has filed a subsequent motion that the appeal be dismissed as moot, alleging that the sureties have paid the total amount of the bond into the court.

Appellants oppose this motion contending that the costs have not been paid and that the $1,000 was paid by one surety alone in reliance upon the state’s confession of error.

Because of the controversy regarding the payment of the principal amount of the bond, the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot will be overruled.

For the same reason, we will not in this appeal pass upon grounds for reversal other than the omission of the statutory requirement in the judgment nisi which the state confesses to be error requiring reversal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blue v. State
170 Tex. Crim. 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Eddie Blue v. State
341 S.W.2d 917 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 S.W.2d 433, 168 Tex. Crim. 518, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cage-v-state-texcrimapp-1959.