Cage v. Rosenberg
8 N.E.2d 613, 274 N.Y. 481, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cage v. Rosenberg. Read the opinion of the Court — 271 N.Y. 509 →
Opinion
Judgment affirmed,, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cage v. Rosenberg, 8 N.E.2d 613, 274 N.Y. 481, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 877 (N.Y. 1937).
8 N.E.2d 613 (Cage v. Rosenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.