Cage v. New York Central Railroad

Third Circuit

Cage v. New York Central Railroad

386 F.2d 998

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 1, 1967·No. Nos. 16560-16562·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

.......OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by the New York Central Railroad from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. By its order, the district court granted third-party defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and denied appellant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial.

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error.

The order of the district court will be affirmed on the basis of its well reasoned opinion, Cage v. New York Central R. R., 276 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Pa., 1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

.......OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by the New York Central Railroad from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. By its order, the district court granted third-party defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and denied appellant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial.

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error.

The order of the district court will be affirmed on the basis of its well reasoned opinion, Cage v. New York Central R. R., 276 F.Supp. 778 (W.D.Pa., 1967).

Cage v. New York Central Railroad, 386 F.2d 998 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

386 F.2d 998 (Cage v. New York Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage and Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Antoinette E. Cage, and Dale C. Cage v. New York Central Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Dale C. Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage, Third-Party

386 F.2d 998 (Third Circuit, 1967)

Opinion

Related