Cage v. Attorney Grievance Commission
732 N.W.2d 909, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1415, 2007 WL 1821013
Opinion
Harold W. CAGE, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The miscellaneous motion is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cage v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 732 N.W.2d 909, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1415, 2007 WL 1821013 (Mich. 2007).
732 N.W.2d 909 (Cage v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.