C.A.G. v. State

125 So. 3d 1004, 2013 WL 3240122, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10261
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 28, 2013
DocketNo. 2D12-1281
StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 3d 1004 (C.A.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C.A.G. v. State, 125 So. 3d 1004, 2013 WL 3240122, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10261 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

C.A.G. challenges the juvenile court’s finding that he violated a Tampa city ordinance prohibiting assemblies obstructing streets and sidewalks. We find no error in that decision and affirm without further comment. But we reverse the court’s order of probation because it does not state the term of the probation imposed. We remand with directions to enter a corrected probationary order. See J.M.W. v. State, 935 So.2d 630, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN, C.J., and LaROSE, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J.M.W. v. State
935 So. 2d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 3d 1004, 2013 WL 3240122, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cag-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.