Caffey v. Trice

745 S.W.2d 751, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 42, 1988 WL 1009
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 1988·No. No. 53116·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from trial court’s order sustaining plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in action for unlawful de-tainer. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caffey v. Trice, 745 S.W.2d 751, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 42, 1988 WL 1009 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).

745 S.W.2d 751 (Caffey v. Trice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.