Café Central v. Readon

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Café Central v. Readon

84 N.Y.S. 863

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 863 (Café Central v. Readon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Café Central v. Readon, 84 N.Y.S. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

We are of the opinion that the evidence in the case shows that Friedman, the judgment debtor, owned the liquor that was levied upon and sold by the defendant as marshal. We do not think the court below erred in admitting in evidence the mortgages, Friedman’s affidavit attached to one of them, and his application on a fir-or tax certificate; and the plaintiff’s exceptions thereto are not well taken. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

We are of the opinion that the evidence in the case shows that Friedman, the judgment debtor, owned the liquor that was levied upon and sold by the defendant as marshal. We do not think the court below erred in admitting in evidence the mortgages, Friedman’s affidavit attached to one of them, and his application on a fir-or tax certificate; and the plaintiff’s exceptions thereto are not well taken. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cafe-central-v-readon-nyappterm-1903.