Café Central v. Readon

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Café Central v. Readon

84 N.Y.S. 863

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 18, 1903·Published

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

We are of the opinion that the evidence in the case shows that Friedman, the judgment debtor, owned the liquor that was levied upon and sold by the defendant as marshal. We do not think the court below erred in admitting in evidence the mortgages, Friedman’s affidavit attached to one of them, and his application on a fir-or tax certificate; and the plaintiff’s exceptions thereto are not well taken. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

We are of the opinion that the evidence in the case shows that Friedman, the judgment debtor, owned the liquor that was levied upon and sold by the defendant as marshal. We do not think the court below erred in admitting in evidence the mortgages, Friedman’s affidavit attached to one of them, and his application on a fir-or tax certificate; and the plaintiff’s exceptions thereto are not well taken. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Café Central v. Readon, 84 N.Y.S. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

84 N.Y.S. 863 (Café Central v. Readon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.