Cafasso v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Cafasso v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.

169 F. 887, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5484

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 169 F. 887 (Cafasso v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cafasso v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co., 169 F. 887, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5484 (circtsdny 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

In my opinion a railroad company, whose railroad is not within the state of New York, but which operates its tugs, boats, and barges in the waters of said state, and delivers coal to piers within said state, is “doing business” therein, and subject therein to the service of process.

The motion to set aside the service of the summons and complaint, and to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

In my opinion a railroad company, whose railroad is not within the state of New York, but which operates its tugs, boats, and barges in the waters of said state, and delivers coal to piers within said state, is “doing business” therein, and subject therein to the service of process.

The motion to set aside the service of the summons and complaint, and to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction, is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 F. 887, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cafasso-v-philadelphia-r-ry-co-circtsdny-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack