Cafara ex rel. De Filippo v. Tillinghast

31 F.2d 1009, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3562
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 24, 1928·No. No. 2258·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Court [31 F.(2d) 384], the decree of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cafara ex rel. De Filippo v. Tillinghast, 31 F.2d 1009, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3562 (1st Cir. 1928).

31 F.2d 1009 (Cafara ex rel. De Filippo v. Tillinghast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Costanzo v. Tillinghast
56 F.2d 566 (First Circuit, 1932)