Caesar v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Caesar v. United States

19 Cust. Ct. 138, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1054

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 25, 1947

DocketNo. 51915; protests 865101-G, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Cust. Ct. 138 (Caesar v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caesar v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 138, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1054 (cusc 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It appeared from the testimony that the merchandise in question is of the same dutiable character as the umbrella cloth covered by Caesar & Co. v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 34, C. D. 278), id. v. id. (6 Cust. Ct. 455, C. D. 515), and Abstract 50363. The protests were therefore sustained as to either of the claims made, according to the dates of entry or withdrawal from warehouse, but overruled in all other respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It appeared from the testimony that the merchandise in question is of the same dutiable character as the umbrella cloth covered by Caesar & Co. v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 34, C. D. 278), id. v. id. (6 Cust. Ct. 455, C. D. 515), and Abstract 50363. The protests were therefore sustained as to either of the claims made, according to the dates of entry or withdrawal from warehouse, but overruled in all other respects.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Cust. Ct. 138, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caesar-v-united-states-cusc-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack