Caesar v. Harlem USA Stores, Inc.

2017 NY Slip Op 3918, 150 A.D.3d 524, 55 N.Y.S.3d 25
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 16, 2017
Docket4046N 157852/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3918 (Caesar v. Harlem USA Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caesar v. Harlem USA Stores, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 3918, 150 A.D.3d 524, 55 N.Y.S.3d 25 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered April 18, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment against it on the condition that defendant answer or respond within 20 days, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant after allegedly slipping and falling down a staircase at a retail clothing store located at 2309 Frederick Douglas Boulevard, New York, New York. The motion court properly granted defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment against it.

Defendant submitted a reasonable excuse for its default (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]) via an affidavit from its president that shows that the wrong address was used for service of process.

Defendant also established a meritorious defense (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc., 67 NY2d at 141; Stillwell Café, Inc. v 1680 Eastchester Realty Corp., 145 AD3d 645, 646 [1st Dept 2016]), as its president denied that it operated a retail clothing store at the address where plaintiff was injured. Moreover, the clothing stores operated by defendant have no staircases, as they are entirely located on the ground floor. Defendant further provided evidence demonstrating that another entity was operating at the address where plaintiff’s accident occurred.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stillwell Café, Inc. v. 1680 Eastchester Realty Corp.
2016 NY Slip Op 8965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.
492 N.E.2d 116 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 3918, 150 A.D.3d 524, 55 N.Y.S.3d 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caesar-v-harlem-usa-stores-inc-nyappdiv-2017.