Caelen Invs. LLC v. Notias

2024 NY Slip Op 31167(U)

• Court: New York Supreme Court, New York County
• Decided: April 5, 2024
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Caelen Invs. LLC v Notias 2024 NY Slip Op 31167(U) April 5, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654142/2020 Judge: Joel M. Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 654142/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 228 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/05/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 03M ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X

CAELENINVESTMENTSLLC INDEX NO. 654142/2020

Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 07/17/2023 - V - MOTION SEQ. NO. 008 NIKOLAOS NOTIAS,

Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- X

HON. JOEL M. COHEN:

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 008) 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 194, 197, 198,199,206,207,208,210,212,213,214, 215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS AFTER SUMMARY were read on this motion for JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Caelen Investments LLC' s ("Plaintiff') application for costs and fees in the

amount of $838,414.56 is granted in part in the amount of $700,000.00.

By order dated December 20, 2023 (NYSCEF 212 [Transcript], 214 [Order]), the Court

granted Plaintiffs renewed motion for summary judgment against Defendant Nikolas Notias

("Defendant") for breach of a Loan Agreement ("Agreement" [NYSCEF 215]). The Court

awarded fees "limited to the claim on which judgment is being granted" (Tr. At 28) and granted

Plaintiff leave to "submit its application for costs and fees provided for under the parties

agreement. .. " 1

Plaintiff now seeks attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $838,414,56, consisting of

$818,391.00 in fees and $20,023.56 in costs. Defendant argues that a substantial reduction is

1 Section 14.02 provides that Defendant "shall pay all costs and expenses relating to negotiating, preparing, executing, enforcing, paying or extinguishing this Agreement. .. "

654142/2020 CAELEN INVESTMENTS LLC vs. NOTIAS, NIKOLAOS Page 1 of4 Motion No. 008

[* 1] 1 of 4 INDEX NO. 654142/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 228 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/05/2024

warranted because Plaintiff has not established an entitlement to fees under Greek law; because

litigating in Athens would have been less expensive; because there is no proof of payment of the

alleged amounts incurred; because certain billed time is non-compensable; and because certain

claims are unsupported or the relevant time entries are redacted.

Defendant's objections pertaining to Greek law and Plaintiff's election to bring its claims

in New York are rejected. With respect to Greek law, the Court awarded costs and fees in the

Order, and that holding is the law of the case (PHH Mtge. Corp. v Burt, 176 AD3d 1242, 1243

[2d Dept 2019] [collecting cases]). With respect to Plaintiff's choice to file this action in New

York, Section 19.05 of the Agreement provides that "[t]he courts of the place of execution of this

Agreement shall have jurisdiction for any action or dispute arising therefrom, as well as the

courts of Athens, to whose concurrent jurisdiction the parties submit under this Agreement."

The Agreement was executed in New York and Plaintiff appropriately relied on the Agreement's

forum selection clause (Sterling Nat. Bank as Assignee of NorVergence, Inc. v E. Shipping

Worldwide, Inc., 35 AD3d 222,223 [1st Dept 2006]).

Defendant's remaining objections warrant deductions, but not in the amounts proposed.

When considering an application for costs and fees, "the court always has the authority and

responsibility to determine that the claim for fees is reasonable" (Solow Mgt. Corp. v Tanger, 19

AD3d 225,226 [1st Dept 2005]). Among the factors to be considered are the "time and labor

required, the difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill required to handle the problems

presented; the lawyer's experience, ability and reputation; the amount involved and benefit

resulting to the client from the services; the customary fee charged by the Bar for similar

services; the contingency or certainty of compensation; the results obtained; and the

responsibility involved" (In re Freeman's Estate, 34 NY2d 1, 9 [1974][citations omitted]).

654142/2020 CAELEN INVESTMENTS LLC vs. NOTIAS, NIKOLAOS Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 008

[* 2] 2 of 4 INDEX NO. 654142/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 228 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/05/2024

Defendant's contention that no proof of payment has been provided is rejected. Counsel

for Plaintiff, Mr. DiBlasi, submitted an affirmation providing that "Plaintiff has paid all of the

attorneys' fees that are reflected in the annexed Costs Schedule up through September 30, 2023,

and all invoices since that date have been recently billed to Plaintiff and Holland & Knight is

awaiting payment" (NYSCEF 213 iJl0).

The Court has discretion to apply the relevant factors, and "an award of attorneys' fees

does not require success at all stages of the litigation" (542 E. 14th St. LLC v Lee, 66 AD3d 18,

24 [l st Dept 2009]). Plaintiff is clearly the prevailing party in this action, and the Court finds

that the majority of Plaintiff's counsel's efforts were relevant to successfully enforcing the

Agreement and are therefore compensable. That said, Defendant correctly notes that Plaintiff's

motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint was unsuccessful (Index No. 652537 /2020)

as was its motion to appoint a receiver (NYSCEF 113). Plaintiff was not the prevailing party in

the 652537 proceeding and is not entitled to associated fees for that matter. Defendant is also

correct that a limited number of time entries are duplicative, unrelated to the Agreement, or

premature. Having considered the record as a whole, the Court finds that a deduction of

approximately 15% is warranted (Arabesque Rec., LLC v Capacity, LLC, 2013 WL 606036

[N.Y. Sup Ct, New York County 2013] [collecting cases]).

Accordingly, itis

ORDERED that Plaintiff's application for reasonable costs and fees, including attorney's

fees, is GRANTED IN PART and Plaintiff is awarded Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars

($700,000.00) in costs and fees; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff re-submit its proposed judgment to conform to this order and

submit a courtesy copy in Word format to sfc-part3@nycourts.gov within five (5) days.

654142/2020 CAELEN INVESTMENTS LLC vs. NOTIAS, NIKOLAOS Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 008

[* 3] 3 of 4 INDEX NO. 654142/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 228 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/05/2024

This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.

4/5/2024 DATE JOEL M. COHEN, J.S.C.

~ ~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

□ DENIED □ GRANTED GRANTED IN PART OTHER

APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

□ CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE

654142/2020 CAELEN INVESTMENTS LLC vs. NOTIAS, NIKOLAOS Page4 of 4 Motion No. 008

[* 4] 4 of 4