Cady v. Missouri Ex Rel. State Highway Comm'n of Mo.
385 U.S. 204
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cady v. Missouri Ex Rel. State Highway Comm'n of Mo., 385 U.S. 204 (1967).
385 U.S. 204 (Cady v. Missouri Ex Rel. State Highway Comm'n of Mo.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Rantz
43 S.W.3d 436 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Anderson
735 S.W.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1987)
City of Columbia v. Baurichter
713 S.W.2d 263 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1986)
State Ex Rel. County of Shannon v. Chilton
626 S.W.2d 426 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)
State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Nickerson
578 S.W.2d 916 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1979)
State Ex Rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. Conley
527 S.W.2d 334 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1975)
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Pinkley
474 S.W.2d 46 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1971)
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Grissom
439 S.W.2d 13 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1969)